The US securities regulator is looking for to revise its $22 million punishment towards decentralized content material platform LBRY, acknowledging it’s unlikely to have the ability to cough up the funds to have the ability to pay it.
In a Could 12 filing in a New Hampshire District Courtroom, the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC) sought an modification to its request for cures in its successful case against LBRY.
As an alternative of looking for the unique $22 million — the quantity it claims LBRY gained from the sale of its token LBRY Credit (LBC), the SEC has requested the court docket to impose a superb of $111,614, citing LBRY’s “lack of funds and near-defunct standing.”
The request additionally asks to cease LBRY from “conducting future unregistered choices of crypto asset securities.”
“The Fee acknowledges LBRY’s representations that it’s defunct, ceasing operations, and with out the funds to pay a bigger superb, and acknowledges {that a} defendant’s means to pay is an element when imposing a civil penalty,” the SEC stated within the submitting.
Hundreds of thousands of {dollars} spent for a superb of $111,614.00 and an organization financially ruined. That helps the world. https://t.co/GhvCS0Az7s
— invoice morgan (@Belisarius2020) May 12, 2023
The SEC first filed a civil go well with towards LBRY in March 2021 alleging the agency’s LBC gross sales have been unregistered securities offerings. It requested for $22 million in disgorgement and for the court docket to order LBRY to halt any additional LBC gross sales.
The SEC won the case in November 2022, the previous Choose additionally dominated LBC was a safety.
Associated: Jump Trading faces lawsuit over alleged $1.3B profit from TerraUSD
The SEC stated the smaller penalty was a compromise between “the necessity to stability the deterrence from a penalty with LBRY’s lack of ability to pay.”
In a December submitting, LBRY claimed the SEC’s request for $22 million wasn’t cheap because it was “vastly” overstated and did not “deduct any of LBRY’s reliable enterprise bills.”
LBRY stated the SEC’s calculation of the sum was “primarily based on tough, back-of-the-envelope math” and the quantity it sought was “merely not supported by the file.”
In December 2022, round a month after the SEC received the case a month prior, LBRY said it “will doubtless be lifeless within the close to future” because of being “killed by authorized and SEC money owed.”
Magazine: Crypto regulation — Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?